That Oprah Winfrey would catch the mandatory first television “confessional” interview with Meghan Markle and Prince Harry wasn’t inevitable, but it was damn close. CBS’s February 15 announcement that a 90-minute vehicle called “Oprah with Meghan and Harry: CBS Primetime Special” would air in March fell with a predictably fine downpour in New York and Los Angeles. As predictable, the news was received in London with a distinct creep that had nothing to do with the February weather. Like almost everything Oprah Winfrey does, broadcasting a special will create its own transcontinental news time system. It is said that it is in a can, the network announced that it will be broadcast on March 7.
But as with many events devised by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, as they raced through the setting of their new lives over the past three years, the broadcast time seems pretty sharp, with its cutting section pretty clearly aimed at young Prince Harry families and its institution, a thousand-year-old monarchy.
Waiting for content and claims on Oprah – after 90 minutes, with Oprah Winfrey as the couple’s interlocutor, there will be more than a few – the television event as a feature of the dialogue between Harry, his spouse and Harry’s family seems to be approaching Shakespeare’s level. it doesn’t seem like a moment to “keep the March Ides”. But the battle between Meghan Markle, in particular, and Buckingham Palace, in general, over the form and content of the “narrative” of her short stay with Harry’s family in England remains at play.
While the topics are expected to be broad, it is precisely this story that will make the talented, ultra-sympathetic interviewer Oprah Winfrey most want her conversations for this show to be clarified on March 7 before a million-strong audience is expected. .
Seen this way, as a signal part of Harry and Meghan Markle’s now transatlantic dialogue with his family, the broadcast will create the first big, public American salvo, from the heart of the entertainment world, to control that narrative. Whether she’s a fan of Oprah or not, her influence is tectonic, and in her chosen confessional show-show format, she serves as an authoritative speaker of truth. An interview with her stamp encodes the current situation, whatever it is, for anyone who is with her on camera. For Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, it is of great importance to give the first confession to Oprah Winfrey: Oprah imprimatur means that the broadcast will function as a cornerstone on which the edifice of their future narrative can rest.
It is axiomatic in America, especially in the part of America with famous countries, that a confessional — whether a book, a movie, or a real-life luxury confession, as Oprah Winfrey often broadcasts on television — is a necessary right of passage to “establish” or to is “re-established” in the eyes of the public. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are engaged in “re-establishment” in California, entertainment and philanthropy.
That American confessional equation for a talk show is roughly familiar for some reason, and then something bad happens to you, either with your own or someone else’s hand, but then you talk about it, either with Oprah or a similar figure, and once you gain weight, your do your job with a fresh step, and probably in a more positive, forgiving, humanized light. In this way, the March 7 show can be seen in context as a kind of Miracle-Gro fertilizer elixir that is scattered through any number of future productions or manufacturing companies the couple decides to develop as part of their Netflix and Spotify businesses. Oprah’s look makes this pair more accessible in the American marketing language and will boost confidence in their own brand of entertainment products.
It will be part of “something bad” in the current confessional of the March 7 talk show – especially that part of what any of them will say – and the senior courtiers of Buckingham Palace will work hard to create a post-Oprah royal stance. In that sense, only one kind of thing happened “something bad happened”, and that was the unhappy and visibly embarrassing Mrs. Markle in her 23-month work as a full, working British kingdom. The internment of that, a filigree of royal life, especially as seen by a glamorous, all-American commoner, withdrawn from the ranks, represents narrative gold for American television audiences.
From the perspective of Buckingham Palace, the monarchy is maintained and maintained with a prudent kind of reserve of stiff upper lips. Certainly, press association photographers and royal family photographers themselves are allowed to photograph the royal family at specific, carefully thought-out family events. But any kind of television member of the “say it all” family is considered a furious nightmare – e.g. Andrew’s much more cruel BBC interview about his connection to Jeffrey Epstein.
Hence, the term in London for this broadcast seems so emphatically difficult. In London, this is read as another in a long line of high-profile “insults” the couple has produced against the Queen, the Crown, Charles and William – against the whole operation that they are British and actually have a monarchy. March 7 marks the end of the first week of the long-anticipated twelfth month after Megxit, in which a “revision” of a difficult agreement with the couple by the Queen and Charles takes place. Significantly, Harry, reportedly without Meghan Markle, is rumored to be traveling home to see the family at some point in March, whether to conclude or at least discuss a review of the Megxit deal. That’s why the Queen, Charles, and their senior courtiers rightly care about any unfettered pronunciation from Montecito, California, or, now, from Oprah’s Chicago or California manufacturing base.
Frankly, it’s unlikely that Harry will stop by Clarence House with his brother to discard a few single malts with Charles while enjoying the Oprah show.