Game theory can be useful in explaining and fighting viruses

Credit: CC0 Public Domain

The research team concludes that a game theory approach may offer new insights into the spread and interference of viruses, such as SARS-CoV-2. His work, described in Journal of the Royal Society Interface, applies the “signal game” to the analysis of cellular processes in illuminating molecular behavior.

“We need new models and technologies on many levels to understand how to tame viral pandemics,” explains Bud Mishra, a professor at the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences at NYU and one of the authors of the paper. “At the biomolecular level, we explain how cellularization can be understood in ways that stop disease and promote healthy functioning.”

The analysis, which included William Casey, an assistant professor in the Department of Cybernetics at the American Naval Academy, and Steven Massey, an assistant professor in the Department of Biology at the University of Puerto Rico, focused on the biological and evolutionary phenomenon of “mimicry.” another.

Researchers have specifically focused on two types of mimicry: “Batesian” and “Muellerian”. Batesian mimicry, named after naturalist Henry Walter Bates, involves conflict or deception between sender and receiver – for example, a harmless fly fly mimics a more dangerous wasp to deter predators. In contrast, Mueller mimicry, named after zoologist and naturalist Johann Friedrich Theodor Mueller, occurs when there is a common interest between sender and receiver – for example, two species that adopt warning signals as a means of protecting both.

These types of mimicry also occur at the molecular level.

“The RNA gene or protein macro-molecule can be considered the sender, while the signal consists of a three-dimensional conformation of the expressed gene product,” the authors write. “The host is a macro-molecule, which specifically communicates with a signaling macro-molecule, usually a protein, but can also be an RNA or DNA molecule.”

They add that the SARS-CoV-2 virus repeatedly uses molecular mimicry in its efforts to exploit its human host by mimicking, in a Bates way, healthy cells to infect the host organism. In contrast, vaccines trick the human immune system into feeling the virus attack it. Although this deception is costly to the vaccinated subject in the short term – in the form of injection reactions – the immune system retains memory and is thus prepared in advance for a future encounter with the real virus.

This dynamic is played out every year in the development of influenza vaccines – vaccines are changed every year to accurately mimic the newly developed influenza virus.

With this in mind, the researchers tried to determine whether signal play could provide a framework for analyzing different types of facial expressions. Under the signaling game, the sender wants to convince the recipient that he is carrying a message that benefits both of them – regardless of the veracity of the request.

In their analysis, the authors constructed a mathematical model that outlined a series of signaling strategies that could, in theory, be adopted by both the virus (Bates mimicry) and the vaccine (Mullerian mimicry). Their results offered a series of blueprints for how mimicry is formed, maintained, and destroyed in cell populations.

“Better knowledge of the deceptive strategies of SARS-CoV-2 will help inform vaccine design,” the researchers conclude.


A new study reveals that coronaviruses are masters of mimicry


More information:
HOW SIGNAL GAMES EXPLAIN MIMICRY ON MANY LEVELS: FROM VIRAL EPIDEMIOLOGY TO HUMAN SOCIOLOGY, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, rsif.royalsocietypublishing.or… .1098 / rsif.2020.0689

Provided by New York University

Citation: Game theory can be useful in explaining and combating viruses (2021, February 23) downloaded February 23, 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2021-02-game-theory-combating-viruses.html

This document is protected by copyright. Except for any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without written permission. The content is available for informational purposes only.

Source